EDF Consultion Stage 2 SCC Endeavour House Joint Response. 30th January2017.

This was written following the TASC Committee meeting on the 10th February at which we discussed the Suffolk County and Suffolk District Councils report which was very critical of the EDF Consultation 2 document :

The report was voted through to 'Stage Three' by the Cabinet apart from one Councillor, Mr Richard Smith, who voted against it being approved because there had been no reference to the proposed D2 relief road. The Councillors agreed that EDF Consultation 2 fell short of important information in many respects, difficult to follow, quite confusing and, one might conclude, deliberately written with that intention. Noting often, EDF assured 'detail and clarity of intent will follow' while totally ignoring important issues raised in ''Stage One''. Their report on Consultation 2 document high-lighted the difficulty with transport and the inaccessible location and also the necessity for the new nuclear reactors to be constructed over an internationally recognised SSSI (Site of Special Scientific Interest) and AONB's (Areas of Oustanding Natural Beauty).

This area currently supports many safe skilled and semi skilled jobs, with a thriving tourism, recreation and leisure services industry. It is argued by EDF that 900 high skilled jobs will be created following the completion of the nuclear power station. This, we maintain, would include security jobs as well as semi and unskilled workers and would no doubt impact on the decline to existing businesses ability, or need to recruit in tourism and recreation.

Despite this, and after much discussion at Endeavour House, with contributions to the debate from TASC (Together Against Sizewell C) and TEAGS (Theberton and Eastbridge Action Group on Sizewell) the Council approved their report.

It is only TASC who stand firmly opposed to the proposals to provide two nuclear reactors at Sizewell. More nuclear at Sizewell is fundermentally wrong. TASC is constantly trying to raise funds for the fight ahead at 'Stage Three' after which EDF will present their proposals to the Planning Inspectorate to the UK. We are fortunate that our secretary, Joan Girling, has produced on behalf of TASC, a splendid response to Consultation 2. Full of local knowledge of the whole area which would be drastically effected and this is now available on the TASC website.

Members and supporters, WE NEED YOUR SUPPORT On Saturday 25th February at Yoxford Village Hall at 2pm, where we kick off this year with our fund raising 'Jumble Sale'. Contributions are welcome and we look forward to seeing you there. 20p entrance.

EDF Energy has announced  that the next stage of the formal consultation on the proposals for a new nuclear power station at Sizewell will run from 23 November 2016 to 3 February 2017. The TASC secretary, Joan Girling was asked by the East Anglian Daily Times to give a statement about the announcement..


Statement from TASC to EADT 8-11-2016

We are pleased that, after waiting four years almost to the day, we are at last going to see the results of the work that EdF have undertaken in response to all the issues that were indentified in the 1st consultation. However it is very unfortunate that EdF consider it perfectly acceptable to put this to the Local Authorities and to local groups and individuals over the Christmas period. Just as they did four years ago.

Nevertheless TASC are ready for whatever the 2nd Consultation contains.

The many areas of concern which were flagged up at the woefully inadequate 1st stage consultation must be seen to be addressed by EdF.

We will be looking for an in depth assessment of the amount of land which is to be part of the development of SZC, ground plans of the footprint of the proposed buildings for two EPRs and the ancillary buildings which accompany this massive construction, all in a totally inappropriate site. The consultation should include the areas in the Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty to be used for all construction work, storage, concrete batching plant etc , and the Marine Off Loading Facility (MOLF) on our Heritage Coast. We will also look for the Environmental Impact that will occur and which should be documented in the consultation.

TASC feels it is a retrograde step for Central Government to take us down the new nuclear route. Their National Policy Statements on Energy are outdated and outmoded. The documents state that “we need new nuclear in the mix for electricity production”. TASC contests it can be proven that we do not need new nuclear, this is proven by the Governments own figures.

Many new exciting technologies are already in use and even more are coming on stream, why are Government apparently blind to a new way of thinking? Why would a government agree to using old, unproven, dangerous, waste producing, nuclear technology, when more forward looking governments are forging ahead with renewable electricity production that is non polluting and will be available long before SZC is generating electricity.

TASC asks the government to progress an Energy Road map which phases out nuclear power. One which does not add to our existing huge stockpile of radioactive waste, one which uses renewable technology. Great Britian should be leading the way we have the innovation and expertise. But other countries are showing us how it can be achieved. A very sorry state of affairs.

Joan Girling on behalf of TASC

SZC Not for Me

On Monday 5th September the BBC broadcast an episode of Panorama which highlighted some of the safety concerns that are ongoing at Sellafield. Sean Morris from the Nuclear Free Local Authorities (NFLA) circulated the following media release in response (download copy here), alongside a paper giving a more in depth insight into the failings at Sellafield (download copy here)

Nuclear Free Local Authorities (NFLA) media release 6th September 2016

Sellafield: a nuclear site struggling to deal with the basics” - NFLA calls for regulator, Government and Parliamentary inquiry into whistleblower allegations

The Nuclear Free Local Authorities (NFLA) calls today for the Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR), the Government and Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) and the Parliamentary Public Accounts Committee to investigate the shocking claims made by a high-level ‘whistleblower’ at the Sellafield site in last night’s BBC ‘Panorama’ documentary. (1) NFLA also publishes today an overview of the wider issues of Sellafield reprocessing provided by independent radiation consultant, Dr Ian Fairlie.

Amidst the serious allegations made in the documentary include:
- ‘Panorama’ found parts of the Sellafield site regularly have too few staff to operate them safely. During one quarter there was
19 times that such issues occurred. Meg Hillier MP, who chairs the Public Accounts Committee was shocked by the figures and said in the documentary:
“It is incredible. It defies belief actually that anything could be working at below safe staffing levels. There is no excuse.”
- Radioactive materials like uranium and plutonium have been stored in degrading plastic bottles in cupboards for a number of years. Only now are they beginning to be dealt with.
- The whistle-blower (a former senior manager at Sellafield) said his biggest fear was a fire in one of the nuclear waste silos or one of the reprocessing plants, saying:
“If there is a fire there it could generate a plume of radiological waste that will go across Western Europe.”
- Parts of the site are “dangerously run down” and officials from its former managing company Nuclear Management Partners raised concerns some sites could collapse over time, creating a potential environmental catastrophe and a dangerous radioactive release.
- The full cost of decommissioning Sellafield could be as high as
£162 billion and take over a century to undertake.

NFLA have consistently raised similar concerns over the past 20 years (2), and it is not particularly surprised with some of them. However, the comments made by the whistleblower and by former senior officials at Sellafield within the documentary emphasise the urgency of the problem, the decrepit nature of much of the facility and the intolerable risk it continues to pose to the public, not just in Cumbria but across the north of England, across the Irish Sea, and even the whole of Western Europe.

NFLA share the concerns of the local campaigning group CORE that, whilst many of the issues raised by ‘Panorama’ may relate to the ‘bad old days’, the blame still remains with the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority and their inability, despite billions of pounds of taxpayer money, to rectify what the documentary called even the most ‘basic mistakes’.

As CORE said: “Many of the failures are inexcusable – under-staffing as just one example – and the complacent and somewhat cavalier explanations offered to Panorama by Sellafield, NDA and ONR will have swayed few viewers and will do nothing to boost public confidence in the safety of the site.” (3)

NFLA praises the courage of the whistleblower and for the BBC to show such a programme, given their paucity of critical coverage on the nuclear industry in recent years. NFLA note there has been some recent improvements at the site, but these are still completely inadequate in comparison to the level of intolerable risk and the amount of hazards on site. Issues like staff shortage are particularly unacceptable given the huge £1 billion+ annual budget the facility receives. It really is time for more openness and transparency in the operation of the Sellafield site. Just last week the new Minister for Energy Baroness Neville-Rolfe praised the Sellafield site after visiting it. NFLA hopes she and other ministers have now watched the ‘Panorama’ documentary and instead of nice platitudes get down to putting the appropriate measures in place to ensure the NDA does its job properly.

NFLA will send to the Government the latest analysis on Sellafield by Dr Fairlie, which widens the concerns of the NFLA to the reprocessing facilities on the site. Dr Fairlie’s report concludes:
“Most of all, we should recognize that, over the past 60 years (UK) nuclear policies, in both weapons and energy, have poorly served the nation.” (4)

Sellafield lies at the heart of why NFLA remains concerned over the development of nuclear power and new reactors generating more nuclear waste. It is why the current Government review on Hinkley Point should lead to cancellation of the project. The Government should rather move to safer, clean energy alternatives like renewable energy. Furthermore, the Public Accounts Committee and the National Audit Office should resume its close scrutiny of the Sellafield site and the Office for Nuclear Regulation should continue the ongoing tight regulation of the site, and explain how some of the serious allegations made in the documentary have been allowed to occur.

NFLA Chair Councillor Ernie Galsworthy said:
“The allegations made by this courageous former high level manager at Sellafield in the BBC ‘Panorama’ programme are serious, safety-critical and alarming to say the least. They show that, despite some limited improvements, there are huge problems in resolving the most dangerous nuclear facility in the world. I call on the Government to stop making nice platitudes about Sellafield and find out why these allegations made by the whistleblower are continuing to occur. The problems at Sellafield remains a key reason why the UK should not embrace new nuclear but rather concentrate its attention on resolving our nuclear legacy and moving towards safer renewable energy alternatives."

NFLA All Ireland Forum Co Chair Councillor Mark Dearey adds:
“The BBC Panorama documentary on Sellafield highlights yet again why this hazardous site some hundred miles from the Irish coastline remains of such alarm to Irish Councils. I call on Charlie Flanagan to immediately contact its UK counterpart and demand the issues raised by the Sellafield whistleblower are dealt with urgently. He should also ask the Irish Radiological Protection Institute to review its risk assessment of an incident at Sellafield. A fire in the reprocessing facilities could endanger much of Western Europe. That is why such facilities must be closed down and the priority become completely with the safe management and decommissioning of the entire Sellafield site.”

(1) BBC Panorama, 5
th September 2016 http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b07v80s4/panorama-sellafields-nuclear-safety-failings
(2) See, for example, a report by the NFLA SC Policy Advisor Pete Roche for Friends of the Earth Cumbria, ‘Towards a Safer Cumbria: How government, regulators and the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority have neglected nuclear waste in Cumbria’, March 2013
(3) Provided to the NFLA Secretariat by CORE Cumbria and will be on its website shortly –
(4) NFLA Radioactive Waste Policy Briefing 65, ‘The Nonsense of Nuclear Fuel Reprocessing’ by Dr Ian Fairlie, 6
th September 2016, is attached with this media release and will be placed on the homepage of the NFLA website http://www.nuclearpolicy.info.

Report from the East Anglian Daily Times 17 June 2016:

Link to the original article is here

Traces of radioactive material have been found on a second Suffolk beach by scientists monitoring the area around Sizewell.

Two months ago Environment Agency officials revealed that a small amount of an particularly dangerous “unusual” radioactive isotope had been found at Aldeburgh, and now they have disclosed that very small traces of a different element has also been found at Southwold. In both cases officials have stressed that the discoveries were very small amounts and there are no safety or environmental concerns and no risk to members of the public.

Stuart Parr, from the Environment Agency, told the Sizewell Stakeholder Group (SSG), that Caesium – a metal used in medical applications, industrial gauges, and hydrology which is said to be mildly toxic – had been found at Southwold. He said: “It was a very small amount and could be to do with tide patterns.”

Investigations were taking place to find out the source though Caesium was not an unusual element to find. Mr Parr said operators of Sizewell A were carrying out an investigation into the Strontium-90, produced by nuclear fission, found at Aldeburgh beach, one of five beaches monitored in the area. This includes extra monitoring along the resort’s shoreline. He said:

“We are continuing to engage with the operator in this investigation...The extra sampling proposed is continuing as are the investigations outlined to the SSG last time.The results from the analysis of these additional samples are not yet available. It can take many weeks for Sr-90 to be analysed due to the complexity of the analytical technique, which needs to be done in a laboratory....A sample taken from Aldeburgh beach earlier in 2016 has been sent to two laboratories for comparison....Differences in working practices in different laboratories can cause subtle differences in analytical results which become important when working with such low concentrations of Sr-90 in these samples...Once all the data has been received and analysed a full report will be made by Sizewell A....It is important to note that these results are unusual, the levels of radioactivity detected are extremely low and do not represent a hazard to anyone using the beach.”