Find us at the Greenpeace Café in the Kid’s Area & sign the Petition Against Sizewell C.

TASC has launched a petition strongly opposing the construction of Sizewell C. We are going to be at the Latitude festival collecting signatures in the Greenpeace  cafe and kids area.

Festival goers can come and sign the petition and discuss the plans for Sizewell C with us . We hope it will run until the next consultation is announced, and then if we have over 1200 signature the Full Council are obliged to debate it. The petition will also be available for people to sign in the local area over the next few months. The wording is as follows:

"We, the undersigned, strongly oppose the plan by EDFE to construct 2 new Nuclear reactors at Sizewell in Suffolk. The destruction of AONB (Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty), SSSI sites (Site of Special Scientific Interest) and the proximity to Minsmere bird reserve, all on our crumbling Suffolk coastline, is totally unacceptable. A government-backed programme of energy saving and clean renewable energy would combat climate change and avoid the risks of a catastrophic accident, dangers to health and the storage of highly radioactive waste at Sizewell for many years to come. SAY NO TO SIZEWELL C"

 

National Audit Office report highlights that the Hinkley Point C is a risky venture and a bad deal for Britain – investing in renewables must now be prioritised

NFLA media release 23rd June 2017

The Nuclear Free Local Authorities (NFLA) responds to today’s National Audit Office’s damning report on the UK Government’s deal with EDF to build a new nuclear reactor at Hinkley Point C with little surprise, as it has been consistently saying the deal is overly expensive and a bad deal for the taxpayer.

The National Audit Office (NAO) has analysed in detail the financing agreement that was made between the UK Government and EDF for Hinkley Point C, which was essential for EDF to go ahead with the deal. The decades-long deal gives EDF a guaranteed rate of return and locks the country into paying electricity prices which are currently double the existing rate for many years to come.

The NAO could not be more damning in its criticism of the Hinkley Point deal. It states:
“The Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy’s deal for Hinkley Point C has locked consumers into a risky and expensive project with uncertain strategic and economic benefits. (When) the Department finalised the deal in 2016 its value-for-money tests showed the economic case for Hinkley Point C was marginal and subject to significant uncertainty. Less favourable, but reasonable, assumptions about future fossil fuel prices, renewables costs and follow on nuclear projects would have meant the deal was not value for money according to the Department's tests.

The NAO also note EDF may have to seek further financial assistance from the UK Government as their reactor design is ‘unproven’ and the company is in a financially weakened state. The NAO calculate expected costs to the taxpayer of the indirect subsidies to EDF has increased from £6 billion to a huge £30 billion. Today’s report finds that the Department has not sufficiently considered the costs and risks of its deal for consumers. It only considered the impact on bills up to 2030, which does not take account of the fact that consumers are locked into paying for Hinkley Point C long afterwards. It also did not conclude whether the forecast top-up payments are affordable.”

The most damning statement by the NAO is that: “The government has increasingly emphasised Hinkley Point C's unquantified strategic benefits, but it has little control over these and no plan yet in place to realise them.” (1)

NFLA call on the new Government to urgently reconsider this overly expensive deal, which is still subject to a legal challenge from the Austrian Government currently going through the European courts.

2017 has truly seen the global renewable energy and decentralised energy revolution take off. The costs of onshore and offshore wind, solar and other forms of renewable energy are rapidly decreasing. These energy industries are now regularly producing copious amounts of electricity as fossil fuels and nuclear generation decline. In addition, there are hundreds of local authorities developing innovative low carbon energy schemes (2), and thousands of community energy cooperatives producing enough energy to power 130,000 households alone. (3)
Even the ‘Big Six’ utilities see the game is almost up. Just this week Centrica (the owner of British Gas) offloaded two large gas plants for £318 million so that it can invest in the generation of power at a smaller and local level. (4)

Following the inconclusive election result, NFLA calls on all political parties to understand the reality of the heavy financial costs of new nuclear in comparison to the rapidly declining costs of renewable and decentralised energy. With EDF also enduring major problems with its nuclear business, and under a huge debt burden, time has surely come for a completely different direction in UK energy policy.

As Paul Dorfman, NFLA’s representative to the EPA Radiation Issues Committee notes:
“The UK Parliamentary finance watchdog has to weigh its words carefully. But in civil service terms, the NAO has justly and effectively damned the Hinkley nuclear deal. The reality is that new nuclear is, quite simply, too costly. The nuclear industry rhetoric is for nuclear plus renewables. But given the reality of the economics it's nuclear or renewables. And the fact of the matter is that renewables wins hands down."  
 
NFLA Steering Committee Vice-Chair Councillor David Blackburn said:
“This NAO report is a devastating blow to the Government and to EDF of a dodgy deal that quite clearly does not stand up to effective scrutiny. It is clear the deal to build Hinkley Point C would lock in the taxpayer to huge financial risks that could total tens of billions of pounds. With Toshiba’s Westinghouse project at Moorside effectively mothballed, Hitachi struggling to reduce costs for Wylfa B, and the content of this NAO report on Hinkley Point, UK new nuclear is in a sorry state. At the same time renewable and decentralised energy is driving forward developing new schemes with rapidity and drastically reducing costs year on year. The Government and opposition parties urgently need to come together and completely review UK energy policy because at present it is not fit for purpose. It is time to embrace the renewable energy revolution instead.”

Notes for editors:
(1)        National Audit Office media release, 23rd June 2017 http://www.nao.org.uk/reports/hinkley-point-c
(2)        NFLA reports on decentralised energy. See http://www.nuclearpolicy.info/wp/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/A273_NB160_Decentralised_energy_update.pdf and http://www.nuclearpolicy.info/wp/wp-conrent/uploads/2016/11/A265-_NB152_-Decentralised-energy-best-practice.pdf
(3)        Business Green 20th June 2017
https://www.businessgreen.com/bg/news/3012277/report-community-energy-powering-130-000-uk-homes
(4)        Financial Times, 21st June 2017
https://www.ft.com/content/1c7db78a-30fe-3d9e-a06e-6fb970de4a5f?mhq5j=e3

TASC has launched a petition strongly opposing the construction of Sizewell C. It has been taken to  Greenpeace events and shops and the response has been very positive. We hope it will run until the next consultation is announced, and then if we have over 1200 signature the Full Council are obliged to debate it. The petition will be available for people to sign in the local area over the next few months. The wording is as follows:

"We, the undersigned, strongly oppose the plan by EDFE to construct 2 new Nuclear reactors at Sizewell in Suffolk. The destruction of AONB (Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty), SSSI sites (Site of Special Scientific Interest) and the proximity to Minsmere bird reserve, all on our crumbling Suffolk coastline, is totally unacceptable. A government-backed programme of energy saving and clean renewable energy would combat climate change and avoid the risks of a catastrophic accident, dangers to health and the storage of highly radioactive waste at Sizewell for many years to come. SAY NO TO SIZEWELL C"

Workers at the EDF site at Hinkley Point have threatened to go on strike after receiving derisory pay offers. EDF have made a lot of noise about the number of jobs that Sizewell C would create, but it is becoming clear that the dodgy practices used to drive down wages at EDF sites abroad are being used here too.

Tim Morris, the Unite regional officer at Hinkley said of the pay deal: "This poor offer is unacceptable under all of the circumstances and our members came to Hinkley Point under the belief that they would receive excellent pay and bonuses. ..The employers think they can do this 'on the cheap' by offering a derisory bonus rate, but the workers consider it to be completely inadequate to attract and hold onto the skilled workforce necessary."1

It is not surprising that EDF are trying to cut corners and build as cheaply as they can –it is well known that they are a company in deep financial trouble. Two years ago the new Chief Executive Officer Jean-Bernard Levy said “EDF’s debt is increasing each year, that’s one of my biggest surprises when I arrived...My biggest astonishment was maybe the fact that cash flow was significantly negative.2

EDF is building nuclear power stations at Flamanville in France and Olkiluoto in Finland. Both of these projects are disastrously over budget and have missed deadline after deadline. What this has translated to for workers on the ground was summed up by Kyösti Suokas, co-chairman of the Finnish Construction Union: “Olkiluoto has been a complete disappointment for us. There have been fewer than 100 Finnish builders there. It is the view of our experts that huge amounts of cheap labour have been brought here from abroad to work inefficiently”3

Things are even worse at the EDF project in Flamanville. In July 2011 the chair of the European Parliament’s employment committee, French deputy Pervenche Berès described the working conditions at Flamanville as A case of modern-day slavery”.4

The conditions at the site came to light after an investigation into a fatal accident in 2011. which resulted in EDFs main contractor Bouygues Construction, being found guilty of serious violations in labour laws and numerous breaches in health and safety in 2015.5

EDF has awarded the contract to build significant parts of Hinkley C to A consortium of Bouygues Construction and Laing O’Rourke.

Suffolk people looking for work at Sizewell C are likely to find that the promise of high quality well paid jobs from EDF is all hot air.

1http://www.somersetlive.co.uk/hinkley-point-power-station-groundworks-staff-threaten-strike-action-due-to-derisory-payment-offe/story-30282993-detail/story.html

2https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-02-12/edf-2014-profit-rises-as-power-production-from-reactors-gained

3http://www.plux.co.uk/slave-labour-building-nuclear-plants/

4https://reporterre.net/Flamanville-est-un-exemple-d

5https://www.challenges.fr/emploi/proces-en-appel-de-bouygues-a-flamanville-pour-fraude-au-travail-detache_437421

Download a copy of no2nuclear power here

 

Taken From: No2NuclearPower April 2017

 

5. Old Energy Order Draws to a Close

The old energy order is drawing to a close as a battery storage revolution takes off, according to the Telegraph. Over the last two years, battery costs have fallen 40%, with further falls to come as economies of scale take hold. Rapid growth in the market for battery storage, forecast by Goldman Sachs to increase by a thousand - fold from $258m (£210m) last year to $258bn in 2025, should in turn remove a number of the key economic constraints on renewable forms o f energy. Wind and solar are intermittent forms of energy, and hitherto have therefore required complementary back - up generation to ensure there is enough power in the grid at all times to service demand. The great promise of storage is that it should lend renewables the same always on” characteristics of more conventional forms of power, allowing electricity to be drawn when the wind is blowing, and given out again when it is not.